Prior to introducing the infographic, have students brainstorm the general purpose of infographics. Emphasize infographics as a tool to visually convey information or ideas, which can be useful when studying complicated issues about historical events, situations, or processes.
Provide students with the infographic and direct volunteers to read the overview in the top left corner. Based on this information, break students into small groups to deduce how the left-side portion of the background map relates to the purpose of the infographic (the map provides the relative location of the countries involved in the Korean War). Next, prompt groups to review “The Human Cost to Koreans” section. Ask the students:
Then use “The Economic Cost to Koreans” section to evaluate the use of a table to compare the economic costs for North Korea and South Korea. Ask your students:
What A War Between North Korea, Us Could Do To Global Economy
Turn to the final section and challenge students to explain how the layout, graphics, and text are used together to tell this aspect of the story. Ask the students:
To conclude, prompt students to discuss what the term “cost” means according to this infographic (the Korean War was expensive in human and economic terms for both sides). Students should support their claims with evidence from the infographic. As an extension, have students create an infographic focused on another conflict.
The audio, illustrations, photos, and videos are credited beneath the media asset, except for promotional images, which generally link to another page that contains the media credit. The Rights Holder for media is the person or group credited.
The Korean War: The Chinese Intervention
For information on user permissions, please read our Terms of Service. If you have questions about how to cite anything on our website in your project or classroom presentation, please contact your teacher. They will best know the preferred format. When you reach out to them, you will need the page title, URL, and the date you accessed the resource.
If a media asset is downloadable, a download button appears in the corner of the media viewer. If no button appears, you cannot download or save the media.The conflict in Korea was the first “hot war” of the superpower confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union. It was the first time — and, to date, the last time — that armies from the United States and the People’s Republic of China confronted each other directly on the battlefield. It left the two Korean states devastated, with millions of casualties and tremendous material destruction. The scars of the conflict are still very much in evidence today.
However, despite having played such a massive role in the Korean war, the United States has largely forgotten about it seventy years later. Korea has never occupied the same place in US public history or popular culture as Vietnam or, more recently, Iraq. ’s Daniel Finn spoke with historian Owen Miller about the legacy of the Korean war and the reasons for this amnesia.
Consequences Of The Korean War.
To begin with, can I ask you to give people a sense of the material and human cost of the Korean war? And can you address the question of how that war has come to be forgotten in the United States and elsewhere, certainly when compared to later conflicts like Vietnam?
To deal with the first question, about the human cost of the war: it was really huge, when you consider that this was a relatively small country — geographically or in terms of population — and yet it cost a huge number of lives. At least as many noncombatants died as soldiers — possibly around 2 million, although there has been no definitive accounting of the numbers of civilian casualties. People often talk about the casualties as being in the millions, which doesn’t really tell us everything that we would like to know. When you compare it to today, where we get daily updates on the toll of the coronavirus, it’s a huge contrast.
There were three phases of the war, which were particularly brutal in different ways for the civilian population of the Korean peninsula.
The Korean War: The War That Ended In A Stalemate
In many ways, there were three phases of the war, which were particularly brutal in different ways for the civilian population of the Korean peninsula. The first of those was before the start of the war proper. We’re talking about the years 1948–49 in South Korea, where there was an emerging guerrilla war — a civil war against, first of all, the US military occupation government, and then against its successor, which was the South Korean government, the Republic of Korea government under Syngman Rhee.
That was a very brutal civil war, particularly on the island of Jeju, where it is still vividly remembered today, and where perhaps thirty thousand people were killed in that small-scale civil war. It continued into what has been described by some recent scholars as a kind of politicidal or genocidal war against Korean civilians and anyone who was deemed to be associated with communism or with communist guerrillas. That claimed the lives of thousands — perhaps hundreds of thousands — more before the start of the war proper, and also immediately after the war began in the summer of 1950, when many political prisoners and suspected communist sympathizers were killed by the Syngman Rhee regime.
That’s the first phase: the lead-up to the war, which was also extremely brutal. Then the opening phase of the war itself, between June 1950 and February or March 1951, was a very mobile war with moving front lines. North Korean forces swept down the peninsula to begin with. You had the UN forces under US command sweeping back up the peninsula, then the Chinese and the North Korean sweeping down again, with the UN forces finally going back up once more.
Solution: The Korean War: Unveiling The Causes, Events, And Far Reaching Consequences Of The North South Conflict (1950 1953).
You had four waves of the war, obviously each time driving refugees before them, causing dreadful human casualties but also destruction of roads, infrastructure, houses, and so on. That’s the second phase, creating millions of refugees and displaced people, who ended up on the side of the border that they did not intend to be on or did not come from.
The final, third phase we can talk about is after the war had reached something of a stalemate in the spring of 1951. You have the beginnings of negotiations for an armistice, but the fighting continues at the front line, which is, by that time, rather ironically, quite close to the 38th parallel, where the peninsula had originally been divided.
At the same time, the US Air Force continues an extremely brutal and extensive aerial bombing campaign against North Korea, which lasts up until 1953 and causes huge devastation. Very few, if any, other countries in the twentieth century have been subjected to such an extensive bombing campaign that was so devastating to the entire country.
The Impact Of The Korean War On The Plastic Surgery Industry — Youthkan
Very few, if any, other countries in the twentieth century have been subjected to such an extensive bombing campaign that was so devastating to the entire country.
As for why it has been forgotten — there was a very good documentary made in the late 1980s by a British TV company, with Jon Halliday and Bruce Cumings, called
, so yes, these ideas of an unknown or forgotten war are very much used in relation to Korea. One thing you could say is that Vietnam came along and, for various reasons, Vietnam eclipsed the Korean war in the consciousness of the United States and the world more generally. The Vietnam and Korean wars came from two different eras in terms of media, so I think that plays a role. Vietnam was often cited as the first big war of the TV news era.
Doc) Impact Of The Korean War
There are many other reasons. In one sense, imperial powers don’t like to remember the brutal wars they prosecute in various parts of the world. Britain doesn’t like to remember its counterinsurgency campaigns and other wars that it carried out. It likes to remember its victorious war against fascism in the Second World War, but it doesn’t remember other wars. I guess that’s another reason — there’s a deliberate amnesia around this.
It was not exactly a victorious war for the United States and the UN; it really ended in a stalemate, back at the situation that prevailed before the beginning of the war. It was not a victory for either side. Both sides found ways to claim victory, but neither really achieved exactly what it wanted to. In that sense, it’s not a war to be remembered.
There was a controversy among historians for a long time about the origins of the war in the short term, rather than the long-term perspective. That was resolved, at least to some extent, by the opening of the Soviet archives in the early ’90s, when we had proof that Stalin had indeed given his blessing to Kim Il Sung to launch an offensive against the South in 1950. But that still leaves open the question, doesn’t it, of whether the war was a homegrown North Korean enterprise that Stalin endorsed, or if Stalin had his own reasons for wanting North Korea to go to war.
The Korean War 1950 1953: Impact And Consequences — Eightify
As far as I understand
0 komentar
Posting Komentar